Did Society Help the BTK Killer Professor Ramos Blog

Did Society Help the BTK Killer On March 9, 1945, one of America’s generally acclaimed and shocking sequential executioners was conceived. One man violently tormented and murdered 10 irregular casualties. He would wound them on different occasions and much of the time, would choke them with ropes, plastic packs, and belts until they choked. (Crawford). This man was named Dennis Radar and has been known as the â€Å"BTK killer†.â The abbreviation represents â€Å"Blind, torment, and Kill†, which was his strategy for murdering his casualties. He additionally picked up the name for composing letters to the open secretly after each murder, closing down with this short name. Dennis Radar experienced childhood in Kansas alongside three different kin. (biography.com Editors). Directly from the bat, Dennis Radar was not a normal resident. At a youthful age he tormented a few creatures and had odd sexual obsessions with ladies. Rader is really a beast in our general public, however the inquiry lies vi gorously on the purposes behind his activities. Breaking down Radar’s youth in tormenting creatures and mental precariousness, his previous activity as a naval force power and what was left after, and his long for consideration in general society by provoking cops about what he has done can give us a sharp eye of what caused Dennis to turn into a beast in the public eye. The essential reason for Dennis Rader’s grievous acts and beast portrayal could be secured to his intellectually precarious wellbeing that has been excused as a youngster. Rader experienced childhood in Kansas alongside three different kin. He had a better than average family life however at a youthful age, Rader demonstrated some irregular and shaky attributes. He would torment and hang the felines and canines at his homestead. (Biography.com staff). These activities show that there is something unquestionably degenerate about his brain as of now. On the off chance that quite possibly his companions or family were to see, he’d have the option to get a mediation that could help his wants to grow farther. Besides, the article likewise states Radar would take women’s clothing and keep them in his room. He likewise conceded that he would fantasize about tormenting and murdering ladies. (Crawford). This shows Rader’s character is an extremely irregular and pre dominant character, particularly towards ladies. The irregular and unusual deeds alongside his terrifying wants depicts this is a main driver for his activities. In the event that perhaps he could have had help in supporting his wants with the assistance of a mental, it tends to be that these wants and deeds he had would not extend and become further. The psychological precariousness and wants he had is one of the vital reasons for his offensive activities. Alongside the BTK Killers youth, his past work could be another remote reason for his activities. A narrative equipped towards Radar’s life clarifies that in his business, Radar was enrolled in the naval force power and had a high position. A short time later, he quit and turned into a consistence official. (AE narratives). It expresses that the explanation he accepted this position could be because of him fulfilling his wants of being controlling and incredible. During his time here, he was known similar to the most â€Å"disrespectful, unrefined person†. He would offer references to ladies just about the pooches in the area.  In the video on minutes 37:10, a kindred associate of the BTK executioner discusses how Rader would â€Å"look within her home and gaze at her†. He had put down one of the inhabitants hounds for no specific explanation. This can propagate the way that his previous activity made him feel increasingly predominant and ground-breaking, along these lines in the long run making him execute.  The previous occupation he has had can be a complementary reason to why he carried out the violations since he had a high situation in the naval force power and after he needed an increasingly higher position that can help satisfy and develop his prevailing sexual wants. Moreover, after he left the naval force, he was left with no activity. He attempted to select back in school however â€Å"earned nothing higher than a C†. He was left with nothing to do and after, he makes reference to that his dreams have been going crazier than they have ever been previously. This in the end drove him to fulfill those wants and began by gazing at a local couple and imaging him tormenting and slaughtering them. (Crawford).  This comes to show that the seclusion and depression of Radar’s life has got him to turn out to be left with only his own contemplations and requirements to feel amazing. He didn't have anything left to distract his wants and not long after that, he submitted his first fierce homicide. This represents having no activity and not being engrossed can be an adequate reason with respect to why he had anticipated the dreams of tormenting and slaughtering residents into the real world. Another explanation with regards to why Dennis Rader submitted his demonstrations and is known as a beast is his long for exposure and consideration. Rader insulted previous cops about what he’s done so as to pick up exposure. For instance, an article breaking down Rader’s past states that â€Å"Seeking consideration, Rader sent a letter to the Eagle, assuming liability for an unsolved 1986 murder†. He’d continually convey letters about what he did to general society and even composed a book. (Rosen, J.).He’d leave notes to open libraries and instruct them to allude to him as the â€Å"BTK killer†. In another companion evaluated article, it expresses that â€Å"serial executioners in our general public are treated as celebrities.† (Wiest). Sequential executioners get met, their photos get indicated all over the place, and there name gets known simply like famous people. Rader’s name, BTK executioner, was and is known after the a ctivities he submitted. At that point, â€Å"BTK killer† was notable and examined. A remote reason for Rader’s activity to turn into a beast could be a direct result of the exposure he was looking for. The activities of him making a special effort to concede that he did the wrongdoing and conveying letters to open authorities could mean and demonstrate he needed to pick up consideration for his activities or potentially his name known to people in general. This shows this can be a remote reason and one of his principle reasons with regards to why he has become today’s beast. He needed consideration, so he murdered more individuals. From that point onward, he needed increasingly more consideration. This shows this can be a corresponding reason just as a remote reason into why he is a beast. Dennis Rader fits the meaning of the beast for the activities he has done. In Cohen’s Thesis 4, they express that the beast â€Å"dwells at the entryway of differences†. (pg. 7). For instance, in a short story, it examines how the beast broke a sexual untouchable (pg.9)â and â€Å"embodies sexual practices that must not be submitted, just through the body of a beast. (p. 14). This can associate with Dennis Raders activities. Rader tormented, blinded, and slaughtered the entirety of his casualties. It expresses that a large portion of his casualties were ladies and hed find sexual delight in tormenting and executing them. (AE docs). Rader certainly broke a sexual untouchable and something that ought not be submitted, yet he was additionally ready to do it through the body of a beast. For him, the body of a beast was his spread as the BTK Killer. Moreover, Rader fits Cohens Monster theory 5 in light of the fact that the beast polices the fringes of which to cross. It s hows what is worthy and isn't satisfactory in the public eye and Raders activities help society show what we can and can not do. Generally speaking, it is extremely apparent that Dennis Rader is viewed as a beast today and fits Cohens seven beast propositions. His psychological flimsiness and prevailing ground-breaking attribute beginning from a kid, his past activity that grew his dreams and wants, and the consequence of his activities and exposure give us a concise clarification of what may have established his activities on why he submitted such abhorrence acts. The activities and deeds he has done is still broadly discussed and known in our general public today. He has opened our eyes on wrongdoing by his malignance demonstrations. Commented on Bib 1.) AE narratives. â€Å"AE Biography the BTK Killer Speaks†. YouTube, transferred by Thomas Day, 13 October 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCtBQQbZD-8 This is a narrative film about Dennis Raders life. They have accumulated various reports from a few distinct sources and genuine individuals and casualties to discuss Dennis Rader’s life. This narrative talks about Dennis’s life. I will utilize this source so as to help demonstrate why his previous life as an occupation showed proof in him paving the way to his picture today. 2.) Biography.com Editors. (November 16 2017). â€Å"Dennis Rader Biography†. A+E Networks.â   https://www.biography.com/individuals/dennis-rader-241487 This article is about the sequential executioner Dennis Radar, known as â€Å"The BTK Killer†. Itâ examines how the brain of Radar and what may have encouraged his activities inâ â â â â â â â â turning into a sequential executioner. I will utilize this to begin the foundation of what he wentâ through and how I can utilize it to clarify the reason for his activities. The article is credibleâ â â â â â â â â â â because of the source is subsidized by A+E, a legislature supported program that joins with theâ â â â â adolescent and prison framework. The creator is additionally a tenable creator for she has been studyingâ â â â â â â â â wrongdoing and criminology. 3.) Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. â€Å"Monster Culture (Seven Theses)† Speaking of Monsters,â â â â â â â â â â â doi:10.1057/9781137101495.0007. pp. 3-25 The purpose behind utilizing Cohen’s article is to show how Dennis Radar has been alluded toâ â â â â and known as the BTK executioner and a beast. I will utilize this to examine how BTK executioner is viewed as a beast in our general public today and how his activities and attributes have ledâ â â â â â â â â â â up to him being a beast. 4.

Assessing The Economic Performance Of Asda Business Essay

Surveying The Economic Performance Of Asda Business Essay ASDA Group Ltd is UK number one biggest food retailers. It sold assortment of things like food, books, clothing, CDs, hardware and house hold things. Prior they have begun as just superstore and today they have extended themselves comprehensively. Objective of ASDA The primary point of any association is to endure or exit in the market .for this they have faith in Value at cash Competitive costs Meeting Consumer needs Progressive rates of profitability. ASDA means to make merchandise and enterprises progressively reasonable for the individuals. Statement of purpose of ASDA The statement of purpose of ASDA is to be the Britains best worth retailer surpassing client needs consistently. It has demonstrated that it esteem a ton for the regard of the individual, client care and greatness. Showcasing methodology of ASDA ASDA is playing on low value/minimal effort procedure in the market. They have let down their working expense just as carbon foot-printing with the assistance of feasible advancement programs. They are utilizing the methodology wherein they are attempting to utilize the best quality items yet with the brought down cost so greatest number of clients can be pulled in. They have attempted their best to keep up a decent connection with the clients. They have improved a great deal in the client administrations. They have played a system of ASDA value assurance to win the trust of the clients to an enormous degree. Association conduct Hierarchical conduct essentially manages the profound investigation of the effect of the considerable number of exercises of people and gatherings inside the conduct of the association. It likewise manages the investigation of the effect of authoritative structure on human conduct. In authoritative conduct there is a reconciliation of numerous different examinations like human science, brain research, social brain science and financial aspects. Hierarchical conduct points with the investigation of commitment of human conduct towards accomplishing more prominent productivity and development of the association. Association conduct can be characterized as deliberate investigation of activities and perspectives that individuals show inside the association (Stephen P. Robin) Taking the effect of various fields on the association conduct its seen that the examination humanism manages the gathering elements. It shows the effect on the gathering conduct to an enormous degree. It additionally manages the jobs played by the people in the association, power, status, correspondence, refereeing, bunch forms, formal hierarchical speculations, collective choice creation and standards. Brain research has affected the association in considers like occupation fulfillment, administration, singular dynamic, execution evaluation, and work pressure and conscience state. With the assistance of investigation of brain research it encourages the association to change the mentality, improving individual abilities and producing positive methodology for the improvement of the association. Indeed, even brain science is additionally viewed as significant for the determination of the workers as it helps in guessing the thoughts of the individual, doing the estimation of the character bent and mentality. As the association need to keep an eye over the administration rules and guidelines. Political theory helps the organization in knowing the situation for monetary venture, work and extension and doing the advancement of global business. Social brain research is the mix of the brain science and human science to get better human conduct in the association. It adds to the capacity of the individuals in the association, support of the social standards, cooperative choice creation and dealing with the change. Human sciences considers the social and natural structure for the human conduct study. Individuals, structure and innovation are the three fundamental segments of the association. For the accomplishment of the objective of the organization they have to concentrate on these three variables. The organization ought to satisfy the ideal needs of their representatives just as keep up a decent connection with them. Groups and gatherings likewise assume crucial job in accomplishing objective of the organization. The association could have formal and casual structure. The conventional structures do have some appropriate arrangement of goals set to monasteries though casual structure doesn't have any such destinations to be dealt with. So essentially association conduct incorporates the examination which includes the administration of relational relationship, recognizable proof of the requirements of the individuals and utilization of the suitable systems to acquire the best outcome. Different ORGANIZATIONAL Behavior ISSUES Association culture of ASDA Association culture mirrors the character of an association. ASDA accepts that they have an extremely one of a kind culture. They have characterized their qualities to their clients, workers and to do best of them. For ASDA their clients are the fundamental substance for them. They attempt to make a justifiable and positive condition for their clients. The representatives are likewise permitted to openly introduce their perspectives for the advancement of the organization. The workers take an interest in various projects held by the ASDA so they can stir up among themselves and with the top level administration. ASDA consistently attempt to rouse their workers by giving various plans and outings. So ASDA have a positive culture with certain guidelines and guideline made to accomplish the target of the organization. they likewise observe all the legitimate laws and attempt to deliver great assortment of item remembering the strength of their clients. Authoritative change in ASDA RESEARCH LEWIN MODEL OF CHANGE Kurt lewin proposed a three phase hypothesis of progress known as unfreeze, change, and refreeze. Stage 1 The unfreezing stage is one of the pivotal stages for any association. This stage is tied in with preparing to change. It is essentially feeling the nearness of important change to be made in the organization and preparing to move from current safe place. It is said that the more we feel that change is important, the more pressing it is, and the more persuaded we are to roll out the improvement. Unfreezing and getting roused for the change is tied in with weighing up the advantages and disadvantages and choosing if the geniuses dwarf the cons before you make any move. This is the premise of what Kurt Lewin called the Force Field Analysis. Power Field Analysis is an extravagant method of saying that there are heaps of various components for and against making change that we should know about. On the off chance that the components for change exceed the elements against change well roll out the improvement. In the event that not, at that point theres low inspiration to change and on the off chance that we feel pushed. Stage 2: Change or Transition The following stage in the wake of unfreezing is the change or progress. It is the inward development or excursion we make in response to a change. This subsequent stage happens as we roll out the improvements that are required. It is frequently said this is the hardest advance as individuals are uncertain or even dreadful. It is anything but a simple time as individuals are finding out about the progressions and should be offered time to comprehend and work with them. Individuals are being upheld by giving a full preparing and instructing. Utilizing good examples and permitting individuals to build up their own answers additionally help to roll out the improvements. Its additionally extremely valuable to continue conveying an away from of the ideal change and the advantages to everybody in the association. Stage 3: Freezing (or Refreezing) Kurt Lewin alludes to this phase as freezing albeit many individuals allude to it as refreezing. As the name proposes this stage is tied in with building up security once the progressions have been made. The progressions are acknowledged and turn into the new standard. Individuals structure new connections and become alright with their schedules. It could require some investment. In todays universe of progress the following new change could occur in weeks or less. There is only no opportunity to subside into agreeable schedules. The unbending nature of freezing doesn't fit with current contemplating change being a consistent, once in a while disorderly procedure wherein incredible adaptability is requested. Association change in ASDA ASDA was the second biggest market store in the United Kingdom in 2005. ASDA has situated itself as an incentive for cash store in the market. Gradually they extended themselves into attire, books, CDs, food supplies, and different family unit things. Around the same time they got grant at the most reduced cost grocery store. The contenders of ASDA like Tesco and J. Sainsbury were additionally attempting to build the market position by extending themselves into the money related items, paper, pharmaceutical items, garments and petroleum. ASDA were having the progressive structure. There were eight levels up to the CEO of the store. These were layered like staff individuals, boss, office administrator, general head supervisor, local activities controller, division executive, tasks chief, joint overseeing executive and CEO. ASDA were having the conventional method of sorting out culture of the association. They were utilizing the bureaucratic method of the board. The staff individuals are kept in discrete piece of the home office to the top officials. The significant issues were taken care of by the top administrators as it were. It was seen that the correspondence design between the administrative center and the stores was one route with top-down administration style. They were utilizing the incorporated circulation yet at the same time there client number was declining quickly. With respect to nature of food they had attempted their best to give new food to the clients yet they couldn't persuade the client up to the normal levels. So they were confronting the multifaceted nature issue in the administration. ASDA accomplished work on perceiving their quality through utilizing great IT, cutting-edge successful dispersion framework and great working administration. To improve the ASDA the board they attempted to expel the such a large number of layers of the administration and making restricted structure to all the more likely comprehend the association. They acquire numerous adjustments in the association like: They began chipping away at expanding the value c

Think About This

Think About This Hi Everyone, I thought it was about time I wrote something interesting something outside of the bounds of routine admissions announcements. But where to add value? Right now were in a strange time. A time of delight for some, and anger and confusion for others. Guidance counselors are calling flabbergasted that the best students of their careers were denied admission. Mothers are dealing with despondent teenagers. And, as we know from message boards and emails, some kids are lashing out. But what you might not see, is that there is also a lot of positivity out there. Many of the questions that were getting are totally respectful, thoughtful, and in many cases difficult to answer. Especially for someone like me who is new to this business. When I think about it though, I think most of the issues Ive encountered this year, as they relate to decisions, can be answered by two things: having a little zen, and a much better understanding of some statistical concepts. Sounds like a weird coupling, I know. When I was in business school I had an introverted and very quirky stats professor. I remember the first day because he made a statement that seemed outside his personality. He said, In the years ahead, you will remember this class much more than the others youll take. It seemed a little bold for this quiet introverted type guy. But he was right. Because errors in statistical thinking happen every day. On the news, in magazines, at the watercooler it happens all day, and I do think of that class often. So, let me tell you it also definitely happens in terms of thinking about admissions. (Warning: some of the theorems below are probably Labs theorems more than they are actual statistical concepts.) So heres what I think is going on: 1.) Not understanding Independence: When you play roulette, the casino puts up a digital board above the game letting players know what numbers have hit recently. The idea being that if you look up there and see that 28 hasnt hit in like 30 spins, youll think, OMG, 28 is totally due. I need to put my entire savings on 28! This is what they want you to think. But because every roulette wheel spin is INDEPENDENT, your chances of hitting 28 are just as good as if it just hit 28 the spin before. The ball has no idea that it didnt land on 28 15 times in a row, its just spinning around following the laws of physics, not the laws of, I saw number 28 in a dream and now I see that it hasnt hit in 15 spins so now I know its going to hit. The first law is true, the second is a construct of your imagination. How this relates to admissions: Some kid says, I saw that your acceptance rate is 8.2% overall. Now, Im not the top kid in my school and I didnt build a rocket in my backyard, so Im extrapolating the 8.2%, giving myself minus 2 points for not being a valedictorian, another 4% for not building a rocket so I think my chances are 2.2%. This is too low a chance so Im not applying. Theres actually a number of problems with the above story. But lets just stay with independence for a second. 19000 kids applied, yes. Around 1500 got accepted, yes. Does that mean that everyone has an 8.2% chance of getting in? No! The 8.2% is the result after the fact. Your application is independent its not affected by the past, or constrained by some percentage. There is no way to know what any particular applications chances are. So dont do this. This ties into the next problem. 2.) Association is not causation. If you read only one part of this blog read this one. Its the big one. If you do a study correlating home prices and number of faucets in a home, you will find a strong correlation. You will not be making a mistake your study will be correct. Also, if you do a study correlating elementary school students test scores with the size of their shoes, you will find a strong correlation. You will not be making a mistake your study will be correct. What?! Its true. These things are definitely correlated. But obviously, their correlation stems from other reasons. (More faucets means more bathrooms, which probably means bigger house, which means more expensive house. Bigger shoes means older kid, which means better at tests.) So now you know they are correlated, but you would never make a mistake by saying one CAUSED the other would you? Putting a random faucet in your bedroom isnt going to increase your home value. Stretching your kids foot isnt going to make her smarter. Dont do this. How this relates to admissions: Some guidance counselor says, Hi Chris, I have four kids in my school who applied to MIT. Two got in. Both of them are xylophone players. This is good to know because now I can tell all the kids to play xylophone because thats clearly what youre looking for. Uh Oh. Dont find yourself constructing mental causation based on incomplete data. One thing that is sort of embedded in the association vs. causation problem is the confirmation bias, which is what the fictional guidance counselor above just did. Heres another example: MIT clearly only accepts people from (x Country) if theyve participated in an International Olympiad. (Because the two kids we picked did ignoring all of their other merits.) 3.) Constructing strange prejudicial opinions and then projecting them on a sample youre wholly unaware of. (Labs theorem) This one is interesting it could really be a cross department study in psychology and sociology. Its loosely related to problems with causation and the confirmation bias but then takes a sharp left turn to whatever particular opinions or issues people may have. It basically goes like this here are actual comments Ive heard this year: MIT has a clear preference for Asian students. MIT has a clear preference for Hispanic students. MIT has a clear preference for men. MIT has a clear preference for women. MIT has a clear preference for students from abroad. MIT has a clear preference for US based students. MIT has a clear preference for rich kids. MIT has a clear preference for kids from families with financial difficulties. Im not trying to make light of any xenophobia people may have, but to read the comments on a number of blog posts this week, you can literally find someone posting one of the above ADJACENT to someone else posting another of the above which statistically is impossible! We cant possibly have a preference for international students and domestic students at the same time. My favorite one was, we only accept liberals. Huh? Is everything now political?! I guess so. I just ate some chicken strips. What does this say about me politically? *sarcasm* (FYI there is no question related to poltical beliefs on the application.) Anyway, I sort of promised that this will be about statistics. So where does this theorem fall overall in the world of admissions? Its relevant because it makes me sad how trapped people are in their microcosms. In their defense, we dont allow them to see the whole picture. This opaqueness allows everyone to construct meaning where there is none. Yes, its true that we seek out talented students of color. No, its not true that those students are less qualified or dont deserve admission. People always forget the second sentence when complaining about the first. Which brings me to another issue. 4.) The insistance that the unquantifiable be quantified. (Or, everyone has a different definition of merit.) We love to quantify things in our life. Economics even tries to do it by using words like, utility. How many units of utility does your computer offer you in comparison to how many units of utility your hairdryer offers you may help you understand how valuable these items are etc, etc. Silly. The facts are that some things cant be quantified. We should begin getting comfortable with that. Take the SAT. Everyone loves to say they hate the thing until they do well on it. Lets say you got a 760 math score. Nice work. You sent an important signal there. The signal is, Im (by one measure) a talented math student. Your friend took the test as well, he got an 800. Youre thinking, ok, we sent the same signal. Both good at math.   Hes thinking, Aha! Im a slightly better math student and want to be rewarded for that. Its kind of ridiculous to think that admissions decisions could come down to someone accidentally missing a negative sign somewhere, not getting a perfect score, then not getting into college. Yet, this kind of insistance on the process being quantifiable is something I hear all the time. So thats why we use the word holistic. That aggravates people for its own reasons. How can you possibly be holistic when your median scores are so high? This flashes back to confirmation bias. Try this: Lets say we have two kids. Both have great grades, scores, recommendations, extra-curricular accomplishments, whatever. One of those has to take the bus an hour and half each way to her high school. This impresses an admissions counselor. The other student works for three hours after school every day cooking french fries for some megomaniacal fast food manager.   This impresses an admissions counselor. How are we supposed to quantify this?   Fryolaters get two points, yogurt shops get one cause thats easier, and long bus commutes get three? Crazy! Its not going to happen. Forget about quantification there is always going to be subjectivity. Which bring me to the end. 5.) Expecting too much certainty: (Embracing subjectivity and randomness) Randomness is everywhere. I read both the Drunkards Walk and The Black Swan both very interesting. Its hard but we have to embrace it. Things are random out there. (Total aside as someone who played sports, I refuse to believe, as any books about randomness say, that hot streaks in sports are all a figment of our imagination and are random occurrences!) Now, this doesnt mean that admissions selection is random. Too many people see an application to have anyone totally fall through the cracks. But heres a statement for you that I believe: the likelihood that one of the kids we denied this year is super awesome and will end up doing something very impactful in a STEM related field is 100%. No doubt. 100% chance. It could be you. There is no way that a.) there are only 1500 talented kids in the world, and b.) that even if there were that were perfect in snagging them all. Its impossible. So if Ive embraced the subjectivity, randomness and accepted that perfection is not attainable, Id like you to as well. Finally: Kids tell me crazy things. Things that make me depressed like, Ill never be happy unless I attend MIT. Or, Ill never amount to anything because I got denied at MIT. I cant tell you how ridiculous that is. I have degrees from 3 different colleges and all of them have students attending them who are learning a lot and are having the time of their lives. This country is full of good colleges, with passionate professors, and staff. Youre going to be just fine. Take it easy on yourself. When I was a kid everyone was trying to get me to work harder. Seems like nowadays we adults are just trying to get you to relax for a second. Sheesh. MIT is an awesome place, but dont make it out to be some nirvana where everyones floating around on flying lazy-boys while their synthetic doppelganger is doing homework for them. Besides, dont forget, Im from California and its 27 degrees right now and its almost April. Not everything is awesome all the time. So let me just end this post by saying this. If you got denied, there is nothing wrong with you or your application. I spoke to a kid the other day who wanted to know where his application was deficient. I looked at his file and read the notes in the file. This is what I told him: Theres nothing in here except very good commentary. How is that possible? There must be something in there! I got denied you know! Theres nothing here except high ratings, and a good, positive summary of your background. Well, I must have done something wrong, I mean . come on, what did I do wrong! You did nothing wrong. This is an awesome application! And it was the truth.

Human Activity And Climate Change - 1252 Words

The IPCC define climate change as â€Å"change in the state of the climate that can be identified (e.g. using statistical tests) by changes in the mean and/or the variability of its properties, and that persists for an extended period, typically decades or longer. It refers to any change in climate over time, whether due to natural variability or as a result of human activity† ( â€Å"Observed†). In today’s society, there are various opinions over whether humans are contributing to climate change or if natural causes are contributing to climate change. Some people believe that humans are the main contributor to climate change, whilst others believe that natural causes are playing a substantially bigger role in contributing to climate change. Both human and natural causes play a role in contributing to climate change. An example of human activity playing a role in contributing to climate change is the increased burning of fossil fuels, which inevitably leads to increased energy consumption. There appears to be a positive correlation, even a causation between increased energy consumption and increased carbon dioxide emissions from 1854 to 2000. For example, in 1854, the world energy consumption for coal, oil and natural gas combined was â€Å"28 exajoules†, by 2000, the world energy consumption for coal, oil and natural gas combined was â€Å"1375 exajoules† (Gail Tverberg). Furthermore, during the industrial revolution from 1760 to 1840, where there was a drastic change in methods ofShow MoreRelatedHuman Activity And Climate Change1141 Words   |  5 PagesHUMAN ACTIVITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE WILLIAM WRIGHT GRANTHAM UNIVERSITY In this paper I will discuss Human Activity and Climate Change. I will discuss different human activities that might affect climate change, things such as the burning of fossil fuels and how they might contribute to climate change. To begin I will discuss what the definition of climate change. Climate change is the change in the atmosphere by the amounts of carbon dioxide levels that come from usingRead MoreHuman Activity And Climate Change874 Words   |  4 PagesHuman Activity and Climate Change Natural atmospheric greenhouse gases, which predominantly consist of water vapor, and minor parts of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane, are vital in balancing Earth’s surface temperature to a life-sustaining average. Indubitable, global warming and cooling has occurred naturally; however, data indicates that the sun’s energy distribution has virtually been constant within the past century. Furthermore, evidence indicates that the balance in greenhouse gasesRead MoreClimate Change : Human Activity1015 Words   |  5 PagesClimate Change: Human Activity is to Blame Climate change is an extremely serious threat because it affects every living thing on the planet. Climate change can have destructive effects like causing extreme weather events, ocean acidification and increasing global temperature. These are only few of the effects of climate change and if it continues can even cause the extinction of humanity. Much of the scientific community agrees that our use of fossil fuels is the cause and our continued dependencyRead MoreClimate Change Is Caused By Human Activities1617 Words   |  7 Pagesnatural and human activities both contribute to climate change, human activities are causing far more detrimental consequences to the Earth that may lead to serious damage if action is not taken. Evidence of this is plentiful and can be found is numerous studies of past climates, empirical data of the current climate, and scientific predictions of potential future climates. It is important to recognize what is, and what causes, climate change. Throughout Earth’s extensive history the climate has naturallyRead MoreThe Effects Of Climate Change On Human Activities1041 Words   |  5 PagesFraudulence of Climate Change Humans have been emitting increasingly large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere since the industrial revolution. A common misconception created by the Liberal Left is that this pollution is harmful to the atmosphere and is a direct cause of climate change. However many studies have disputed this claim, conversely concluding that pollution caused by human activities are not correlated to climate change in any way. In the theory of climate change, there is oneRead MoreThe Effects Of Climate Change On Human Activities864 Words   |  4 PagesClimate change is a highly talked about topic. Scientist have been studying this for many and many years. There are facts that say climate change occurs from natural things like volcanic eruptions, solar activity, and orbital change. Scientist say that its caused by human activities. This is being sent to you because you need to know that climate change is happening from humans more then other things like natural processes. You have inspired me to try my hardest to get to the top and be my best becauseRead MoreEssay on Human Activity in Climate Change721 Words   |  3 PagesThis essay and its contents is designed to define and discuss the concept of my position on the following statement: â€Å"Human activity, especially the burning of fossil fuels. It also answers inquiries of; is it a major contributor to climate change? Do I agree or disagree? From my research and readings, I‘ve concluded that, the foremost effect that burning fossil fuels has on our environment is the greenhouse effect, also known as global warming. Carbon dioxide, which is also known as greenhouseRead MoreClimate Change Is Caused By Human Activities1975 Words   |  8 Pagesto the new Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2013, in Southeast Asia, temperature has been increasing at a rate of 0.14 to 0.20 degree Celsius per decade since the 1960s while rainfall from extreme rain days has increased by 10 millimeters per decade. Both of these increments are caused by climate change. In addition to increase of temperature and extreme precipitations, climate change also increases landslides, exacerbates soil erosion, causes floodingRead MoreGlobal Climate Change and Human Activity Essay1152 Words   |  5 Pages and human activities being the main cause to the negative changes in the global climate. Natural cau ses like volcanic eruptions, the changes in the sun’s radiation, and the ocean current shifts noticed are contributing to the global climate change. In addition, the human activities such as the burning fossil fuels, and the cutting down of trees [forests] so as to create land to cultivate and rare cattle affect the climate change. The human activities that are done affect the global climate thatRead MoreHuman Activity Is Responsible For Global Climate Change900 Words   |  4 PagesHuman Activity is Primarily Responsible for Global Climate change Global Warming is a long term increase in earth’s average surface temperature. Because global warming does not cause uniform warming in all locations and because many other changes in climate are occurring, scientists often prefer to speak of ‘’Global Climate Change’’ rather than of global warming when referring to the whole complex of climate changes caused by Human activities. Global climate changes, including episodes of global

Analysis Of The Fall As One Of Camus - 1950 Words

In dealing with The Fall as one of Camus short masterpieces on the theme of passive human avoidance, we have the most highly personal account of the evil located within the individual himself and within the very language he uses. Unlike the main character, Meursault in L Etranger, who is pursued by a blind fate and involuntary kills an Arab, and is misunderstood by a hypocritical society, Jean-Baptiste Clamence, The main character in The Fall, a judge-penitent, is guilty of a specific crime of passivity, morally immobile and unable to act. The central event is the scene of the bridge in which he does not act and into this inertia, Camus sinks his reader into the darkness of the human condition, offering no solutions or†¦show more content†¦So Clamence admits that he refused to part with his riches to the poor. Then as his visitor decides to leave ,Clamence accompanies him telling him that he likes the Dutch people so wedged into a little space of houses and canals, circles of hell( a possible reference to Dante s Inferno ) they are like him double and the canals represent for Clamence, the circles of hell , places of imprisonment of no exit . Before he leaves his visitor to his own refuge, Clamence informs him that he never crosses a bridge at night ,since if someone should jump into the water ,either you follow suit to fish him out or you forsake him there and suppress a d ive --–leaves one strangely aching. The second day, Clamence explains to his visitor/listener his profession as a well known lawyer in Paris, happy in the defence of noble causes, widows and orphans and the satisfaction on being on the right side of the bar and scorning judges in general .So Clamence summaries his successful life in Paris until an incident in which the hear a sudden a laugh behind him as he walked up the quays of the Left Bank .and on arriving home his reflection on the mirror was smiling at him as though it was double in an attempt to show, or hide his own guilt or moral inaction. By the third day, the character of Clamence, to his visitor/listener,Show MoreRelatedAlbert Camus The Fall1745 Words   |  7 PagesAlbert Camus is known all over the world as a French philosopher who contributed to the ideas of absurdism. He is also known for his philosophical literature. More specifically I want to focus my attention to what some people may call a book that influenced many generations. This name of the book is called â€Å"The Fall†. In this book, the reader views a different perspective of life from a character called monsieur Jean-Baptiste Clamence. Through this character Camus challenges the reader to look throughRead MoreThe Stranger By Albert Camus1365 Words   |  6 PagesThroughout The Stranger, Albert Camus uses routinesituations to demonstrate how the protagonist, Meursault is not just another ordinary individual. Camus depicts Meursault as an independent being, disinterested in his surroundings, contrasting him with the majority of his peers. Meursault traverses the entire novel, exhibiting little to no emotion. Instead, he displayscharacteristics synonymous to someone suffering from psychopathy. Regardless of the situation, Meursault refrainsfrom assigning meaningRead More The Stranger Essay1301 Words   |  6 PagesWhile reading The Stranger I noticed that traits that Albert Camus character depicts in the book are closely related to the theories of Sigmund Freud on moral human behavior. Albert Camus portrays his character of Meursault as a numb, emotionless person that seems to mindlessly play out his role in societ y, acting in a manner that he sees as the way he’s supposed to act, always living in the moment with his instincts driving him, and if the right circumstance presents itself the primal deep seededRead MoreEssay On The Stranger1010 Words   |  5 Pages The Stranger Essay The Stranger by Albert Camus is an analysis of the human psychosis if it was isolated and apathetic. Throughout the story, our protagonist, Meursault, tells the story of his life after his mother’s death and his experiences with everyday routines. Meursault explains to the reader only the surface of what he is feeling; despite that, as a reader, one is able to view his mind directly and closely. Meursault has all the power in this book because it is his life and mind. He is ableRead More Essay on Camus’ The Stranger (The Outsider): Reader Response Criticism2226 Words   |  9 PagesReader Response Criticism to Camus’ The Stranger (The Outsider)  Ã‚        Ã‚  Ã‚   In The Stranger (The Outsider), Albert Camus anticipates an active reader that will react to his text. He wants the reader to form a changing, dynamic opinion of Meursault. The reader can create a consciousness for Meursault from the facts that Meursault reports. By using vague and ambiguous language, Camus stimulates the reader to explore all possibilities of meaning. Camus also intends to shock the reader into rereadingRead MoreThe Individual Versus His Environment in The Stranger and Grendel1674 Words   |  7 Pages The Individual Versus His Environment in The Stranger and Grendel Due to the multifaceted nature of literature, analysis thereof is prone to generalization. One of the most grievous generalizations oft encountered involves failing to distinguish between a character and the novel it inhabits. Take John Gardener’s Grendel and Albert Camus’s The Stranger, for instance. It’s far too easy, when analyzing for dominant ideologies, to slap them both with the label of existentialism and be done withRead MoreHow Personality Is Important For A Good Person Job Fit882 Words   |  4 PagesMarvin Downard Mgmt 3010 Assignment 2 â€Å"We continue to shape our personality all our life. If we knew ourselves perfectly, we should die.† Albert Camus - French Novelist, Essayist and Playwright, 1957 Nobel Prize for Literature Understanding the role of personality in the work place is crucial to ensuring a good person job fit. When people go to work they bring with them there individual traits and personalities with them. No matter the position they hold within the company, there personalityRead MoreIs Suffering an Inescapable Part of Life? Are There Any Advantages?4432 Words   |  18 Pagesit have any advantages? Suffering is an inescapable part of life. Whether it involves the minor bumps and bruises of daily living or major traumas such as terminal illness, death, or the breaking of a family, suffering touches all of our lives at one point or another. Helen Keller once said, The world is full of suffering, but it is also full of people overcoming it. Though Helen Keller was not a philosopher, in this quote she tells us why the topic of suffering is extremely important in lifeRead MoreEnglish: Essay and Film Study1298 Words   |  6 Pages Mary Ellen Zaglewski English 1101, Fall 2012, CRN 86404 TR: 9:50-11:05 G211 CRN 89139 TR: 11:15-12:30 G221 Office Hours: 11:30-3:30 MW, 3:30-5:30 TR, others by appointment. Office: G110K E-mail: maryzaglewski@clayton.edu Phone: 678-466-4880 Clayton State University - English 1101 Course Syllabus Course Title: English Composition I Course Description: This course focuses on skills required for effective writing in a variety ofRead MoreExistentialism vs Essentialism23287 Words   |  94 Pagesamp; Phenomenology * Existentialist Philosophers * ------------------------------------------------- Absurdism * The idea of the  absurd  is a common theme in many existentialist works, particularly in  Camus. Absurdity is the notion of contrast between two things. As Camus explains it in  The Myth of Sisyphus: * The absurd is born out of this confrontation between the human need and the unreasonable silence of the world. * This view, which is shared by  Sartre, is that humanity

Whitefield/Wesley Predestination Free Essays

string(194) " this can be so\? Wesley ultimately presents no proof of his assertions, but instead makes accusations from what Whitefield suspects is an experience of debating men who hold to predestination\." John Wesley’s sermon, entitled â€Å"Free Grace† was published in August, 1739. In it he attempted to show how God’s grace is â€Å"free in all and free for all. † His message was strongly directed toward the doctrine of predestination and election, which was held to by many believers in Wesley’s day. We will write a custom essay sample on Whitefield/Wesley Predestination or any similar topic only for you Order Now He believed that this doctrine was a dangerous one and that it blasphemed the very person and nature of God. In response to Wesley, George Whitefield wrote â€Å"A Letter from George Whitefield to the Rev. John Wesley. Whitefield saw Wesley’s doctrine of â€Å"free grace† as being the one that was blasphemous and dangerous to the faith. He argued that the Bible clearly presents the doctrine of predestination, and that any doctrine that stated otherwise led to the heresy of universalism. The two men had worked together in the ministry for quite some time when these two documents were published. Wesley adopted many evangelical views of Christianity when he was converted, but he retained some of his pre-conversion beliefs concerning predestination. When Whitefield left England on a trip, Wesley quickly published his sermon on â€Å"free grace. When Whitefield returned, he was determined to respond and set the record straight. Both of these men presented strong arguments supporting both of their views. It is difficult to compare the two equally, because Whitefield only addresses certain issues in Wesley’s sermon and not it’s entirety. That being said, I believe that George Whitefield’s arguments concerning predestination and soteriology are superior to John Wesley’s due to how he handles Scr ipture and logical thought. Wesley’s sermon on â€Å"free grace† had six major points. For the purpose of this paper, I have selected for discussion only the points that Whitefield directly addressed in his letter of response. In doing so, I hope to make apparent that Whitefield had a much stronger argument and a much more biblical understanding of predestination in soteriology. Wesley begins his sermon with a fair and accurate assessment of the possible views a person might hold, concerning predestination. He clearly shows that while many people may say that they only hold to certain parts of the doctrine, they ultimately believe in the whole. He defines the doctrine as, â€Å"As virtue of an eternal, unchangeable, irresistible decree of God, one part of mankind are infallibly saved, and the rest infallibly damned; it being impossible that any of the former should be damned, or that any of the latter should be saved. † This is a very good and biblical definition of predestination, but the implications Wesley draws from it are not. The first error that Wesley concludes is that predestination eliminates the need for evangelism. He says, â€Å"[Preaching] is needless to them that are elected; for they, whether with preaching or without, will infallibly be saved. In other words, if God will unconditionally elect some people, then it is unnecessary for those people to be evangelized. The same goes for the non-elect. If they are to be unconditionally damned to hell, then evangelism will have no effect in saving them. In Predestination Calmly Considered, he says: â€Å"His ministers indeed, as they know not the event of things, may be sincere in offering salvation to all persons, according to their general commission, ‘Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. But how can God or Christ be sincere in sending them with this commission, to offer his grace to all men, if God has not provided such grace for all men, no, not so much as conditionally? † I believe that Whitefield has a much clearer understanding of Scripture when he responds to Wesley’s statement concerning evangelism. He asks, â€Å"Hath not God, who hath appointed salvation for a certain number, appointed also the preaching of the Word as a means to bring them to it? † Whitefield understood that evangelism is the means that God uses to bring His elect to salvation. Whitefield goes on saying, â€Å"Since we do not know who are elect and who are reprobate, we are to preach promiscuously to all. For the Word may be useful, even to the non-elect, in restraining them from much wickedness and sin. † Whitefield could see how beneficial the Word is for both the elect and reprobate. Scripture supports Whitefield on this matter, especially in Romans 10. Paul explains that â€Å"faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ,† and earlier he asks, â€Å"How are they to hear without someone preaching? And how are they to preach unless they are sent? The Bible clearly states that the only way that the elect will come to faith in Christ is through evangelism. John Calvin also viewed evangelism and predestination in the same light as Whitefield. He concluded: â€Å"Since we do not know who belongs to the number of the predestined and who does not, it befits us so to feel as to wish that all be saved. So it will come about tha t, whoever we come across, we shall study to make him a sharer of peace†¦ even severe rebuke will be administered like medicine, lest they should perish or cause others to perish. But it will be for God to make it effective in those whom He foreknew and predestined. Calvin would have supported Whitefield’s view of evangelism over Wesley’s for certain. The second point of argument concerns predestination and holiness. Wesley says, â€Å"[Predestination] has a manifest tendency to destroy holiness in general; for it wholly takes away those first motives to follow after it, so frequently proposed in Scripture, the hope of future reward and fear of punishment, the hope of heaven and fear of hell. † According to Wesley, those who hold to the doctrine of predestination do not have the same desire to seek holiness as those who do not hold to it. He even makes the assertion that followers of predestination are more temperamental, especially when confronted with opposition to their doctrine. I believe that Whitefield has the stronger argument when h simply asks how this can be so? Wesley ultimately presents no proof of his assertions, but instead makes accusations from what Whitefield suspects is an experience of debating men who hold to predestination. You read "Whitefield/Wesley Predestination" in category "Essay examples" Those men must have had a strong religious zeal that Wesley misunderstood as narrow-mindedness and hostility that flowed from their doctrinal beliefs. Wesley explains that it is expected that those who â€Å"contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints† will bring strong opposition to error. Thirdly, Wesley says predestination â€Å"tends to destroy the comfort of religion, the happiness of Christianity. This is evident as to all those who believe themselves to be reprobated, or who only suspect or fear it. † He claims that those who hold to the doctrine of predestination do not have the comfort of the assurance of salvation since they can never be sure if they are one of the elect or not. They will at some point and time become doubtful of their salvation, even when they have the witness of the Holy Spirit. Wesley also claims that many people throughout the world who do not hold to predestination â€Å"enjoy the uninterrupted witness of his Spirit, the continual light of his countenance, from the moment wherein they first believed, for many month or years, to this day. † Once again, I believe that Whitefield tears down Wesley’s argument when he asks, â€Å"How does Mr. Wesley know this, who never believed election? In other words, how could Wesley have understood the heart of a person who believes in predestination if he never believed in the doctrine himself? He presents a selection from the reformers that show how they were holders of predestination and yet still described the Christian life as being â€Å"full of sweet, pleasant, unspeakable comfort to godly persons, and such as feel in themselves the working of the Spirit of Christ†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Ev idently the heart of the elect is not full of turmoil and despair after all. In response to Wesley’s belief that some people in the world experience uninterrupted assurance, Whitefield asks how he could ever have known such a thing. There is no way that Wesley could have made contact with people all over the world that had these experiences. Whitefield understood that everyone goes through doubts and never as a life-long period of assurance of salvation. Even Jesus Christ experienced times of doubt in the garden, and what greater moment of darkness has ever been experienced than that of His time on the cross, crying, â€Å"My God! My God! Why hast thou forsaken me? † Wesley then asks, â€Å"How uncomfortable a thought is this, that thousands and millions of men, without any preceding offense or fault of theirs, were unchangeably doomed to everlasting burnings! † To Wesley, the doctrine of predestination is a terrible one because it condemns men to hell that are undeserving of such punishment. He does not see original sin as being the cause for people’s damnation. In his work, Predestination Calmly Considered, he says, â€Å"Perhaps you will say they are not condemned for actual but for original sin. What do you mean by this term? The sin which that Adam committed in paradise? That this is imputed to all men, I allow†¦But that any will be damned for this alone, I allow not. † Whitefield had a better understanding of this matter. He viewed all men as being deserving of hell due to the imparted sin of Adam’s rebellion in the garden. He charges that if Wesley denies the doctrine of original sin, then he must take on the doctrine of reprobation for whether Wesley believed it or not â€Å"the Word of God abides faithful: ‘The election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded. † The final issue of debate is over the doctrine of predestination and the Bible. Wesley says, â€Å"[Predestination] hath also a direct and manifest tendency to overthrow the whole Christian Revelation. The point which the wisest of the modern unbelievers most industriously labour to prove, is, that the Christian Revelation is not necessary. † According to Wesley, the Bib le is not necessary because the elect would find faith without it since their salvation is decreed by God. This is very similar to his argument concerning predestination and evangelism. Whitefield again has a great answer saying, â€Å"It is only by the Christian revelation that we are acquainted with God’s design of saving his church by the death of his Son. Yea, it is settles in the everlasting covenant that this salvation shall be applied to the elect through the knowledge and faith of him. † He goes on saying that the Bible is a necessity because it is only through Scripture that God’s eternal decrees of salvation take effect. We cannot separate God’s means from His ends or His ends from His means. Wesley then goes on to say that Scripture in light of predestination contradicts itself. He uses the case of â€Å"Jacob have I loved, but Esau I have hated,† as implying that God â€Å"in a literal sense hated Esau, and all the reprobated, from all eternity. † He sees this as a contradiction due to Scripture saying that â€Å"God is love. † He did not view this passage as being a literal hating of the persons of Jacob and Esau, but instead of the temperament within them. In Predestination Calmly Considered, he states, â€Å"According to Scripture [God’s] unchangeableness of affection properly and primarily regards tempers and not persons; and persons only as those tempers found in them. † I believe Whitefield has a better argument since he holds to a more literal interpretation of the Bible without contradiction. He argues that it is not changing God’s character to love Jacob and hate Esau. He says, â€Å"Might not God, of his own good pleasure, love or show mercy to Jacob and the elect—and yet at the same time do the reprobate no wrong? But you say, â€Å"God is love. † And cannot God be love, unless he shows the same mercy to all? † In the same way, Wesley argues that, in the eyes of the person who holds to predestination, the passage â€Å"I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy† means that God is love only to the elect and not to the non-elect. He says that this is in direct contradiction to Psalm 114:9, saying, â€Å"The Lord is loving unto every man; and his mercy is over all his works. † If God is loving to everyone, then how can He show mercy to only some? Whitefield says that this mercy mentioned is not saving mercy. He is loving to all in that he sends his rain upon the evil and upon the good, but He only sends his saving grace to the elect. He has the right to do this because, as Whitefield puts it, â€Å"[He] is a debtor to none, and has a right to do what he will with his own, and to dispense his favours to what objects he sees fit, merely at his pleasure. † He uses Romans 9:15 and Exodus 33:19 to back up this statement: â€Å"I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. † Overall, Wesley tries to tear down the doctrine of predestination in light of his doctrine of â€Å"free grace. † To Wesley grace is free to every individual person in the world, and it is on the basis of acceptance or rejection of that grace that a person is sent to hell or heaven. He explains the unchangeable decrees of God in light of free grace in Predestination Calmly Considered: â€Å"He has unchangeably decreed to save holy believers, and to condemn obstinate, impenitent unbelievers. † According to Wesley, a person’s eternal destiny lies solely in whether or not he accepts God’s â€Å"free grace. † I believe Whitefield sums Wesley’s argument up well when he states, â€Å"You plainly make salvation depend not on God’s free grace, but on man’s free-will. † If this is the case then like Whitefield said, â€Å"It is more probable Jesus Christ would not have had the satisfaction of seeing the fruit of his death in the eternal salvation of one soul. Our preaching would then be in vain, and all the invitations for people to believe in him would also be in vain. † Both Wesley and Whitefield knew the Scriptures well, but I believe it is Whitefield that truly understood how important election is in the believer’s theology. Wesley tried to use Scripture to back up his points, but his interpretation of passages led him into the territory of universalism. I believe that due to this dangerous direction it is Whitefield who had the correct understanding of predestination and soteriology. On my honor, I have neither given nor taken improper assistance in completing this assignment. Word Count: 2455 ——————————————– [ 1 ]. Ibid. [ 2 ]. Wesley, Predestination Calmly Considered, 268. [ 3 ]. Whitefield, George. â€Å"A Letter from? George Whitefield? to the? Rev. Mr. John Wesley,† 59. [ 4 ]. Ibid. [ 5 ]. Calvin, John, Concerning the Eternal Predestination of God, trans. J. K. S. Reid (London: James Clarke and Co. , Limited, 1961), 138. [ 6 ]. Wesley. â€Å"Free Grace,† 117. [ 7 ]. Whitefield. 61. [ 8 ]. Wesley. â€Å"Free Grace,† 119. [ 9 ]. Ibid. [ 10 ]. Whitefield. 62. [ 11 ]. Ibid. [ 12 ]. Wesley. â€Å"Free Grace,† 119. [ 13 ]. Wesley. Predestination†¦, 263. [ 14 ]. Whitefield. 68. [ 15 ]. Wesley. â€Å"Free Grace,† 120. [ 16 ]. Whitefield. 68. [ 17 ]. Wesley. â€Å"Free Grace,† 120. [ 18 ]. Wesley. Predestination†¦, 279. [ 19 ]. Whitefield. 69. [ 20 ]. Ibid. [ 21 ]. Wesley. Predestination†¦, 279. [ 22 ]. Whitefield. 71. [ 23 ]. Ibid. How to cite Whitefield/Wesley Predestination, Essay examples

Write an essay that outlines that a consumer society is a divided society free essay sample

The principal purpose of this essay is to identify the key facts which substantiate the opinion that a consumer society is a divided society. I will examine the changes in consumer habits during the industrial and consumer societies and look at what primary factors create divisions and why. I will be using course materials ranging from written, audio and visual to determine this. 1. Definition of consumer society 2. Industrial and consumer society I will be looking at how consuming and consumer habits have changed over the different periods. Social factors and divisions To identify the social factors that plays a part in consumer society and to identify how divisions are made in society and why? 4. The seduced and repressed To demonstrate how members of society fall into either the seduced or repressed category, and why? 5. Conclusion To show that I have understood the question by analysing the course material and forming a conclusion that substantiates the opinion in question. We will write a custom essay sample on Write an essay that outlines that a consumer society is a divided society or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Write an essay that outlines that a consumer society is a divided society. Consumer society is a term used by social scientists that relates to people’s purchasing habits and how they dispose of these items, their personal skills, achievements and employment status within society (Bromley, 2009, p. 13). The term consumer society was introduced sometime after the decline of the industrial society, some 30 or so years ago. Social scientists discovered that what society had viewed as important during the industrial times had changed dramatically to what society viewed as important in contemporary society. The emphasis went from society focusing on mass production and work using large-scale power driven machinery during the industrial times, to society focusing on consumption of products and services, not just for important everyday necessities, but were also used to create personal identities and lifestyles, for pleasure, out of habit or just to fit in. Society has been a divided society as far back as the industrial era and probably before that time. During the industrial period people were defined as upper, middle or lower class. The categorisations by class indicate there were obvious inequalities between members of society back then. It also tells you that the upper class were the wealthiest and able to, because of their wealth and status, consume effectively. To consume effectively means that you are able to afford the luxurious products and services that possibly the middle, but definitely the lower class could not afford. Further, to possibly owning and running a successful business that helped to shape the industrial society. Effective consuming was only available to the wealthy until late in the nineteenth century, when consuming became available to the majority rather than just the minority. This was a huge turning point in shaping today’s modern contemporary society. It should be noted that divisions are still apparent in modern society, however not defined by class. The main, but not the only factors that determine divisions within any society are wealth and status, and at times that wealth and status brings power. Wealth allows you to have the best of everything, but power can be very influential within the right circles. For example, a supermarket wants to extend its chain by erecting a store on a desolate site in Glasgow. During the process for consideration, there are residents’ against the proposed development, whilst others are for it. Anti-supermarket campaigners feel that supermarkets limit freedom and shopping choices, as local shops are unable to compete and get pushed out, whilst pro-supermarket campaigners feel that it extends their choices, as well as creating employment (Bromley, 2009, p. 69, p. 71). This is a good example of a divided society in modern times. It has also been suggested by social scientists that there are other social factors that play a huge part in consumer society that helps them to understand consuming and consumer habits. Education, employment, media influence, retailers and goods sold are some of the other factors that need to be considered when observing consumers in a consumer society (Bromley, 2009, p. 21). In the opinion of social scientist Zygmunt Bauman, (cited in Bromley, 2009, p. 25), we are now living in an unequal consumer society as opposed to an unequal industrial society. He further reinforces the point that inequalities do exist today, but they are very different to those during the industrial times. He further maintains that people in contemporary society could be divided into two groups – the seduced and the repressed. Bauman’s interpretations of the seduced were not only consumers who had wealth and status, but also included individuals who had stable employment with enough income to consume effectively, those who had products and services to sell to a lucrative market and also those who were able to acquire credit through lenders. The market offers freedom of choice and because of this some consumers consumed by buying into the principles of consumer society, which allowed them to use these products and services to create their own lifestyles and personal identities. This made people feel worthy and accepted within society. It gave them a sense of belonging. In the industrial times this was achieved by acquiring skill related secure employment and through citizenship rights. Bauman, therefore felt that the seduced â€Å"are those in a position to be admitted to membership in society†¦are able to consume effectively in the eyes of others† (Bromley, 2009, p. At the end of the nineteenth century, social scientist Thorstein Veblen, (cited in Bromley, 2009, p. 31), studied the rich and successful industrialists and their families. He states that people bought things as a means of displaying their wealth and for making an impression on others. â€Å"He found that they bought things for a particular reason:†¦make a positive impression and to demonstrate to others their newly acquired wealth†¦Ã¢â‚¬ . (Bromley, 2009, p. 31). The items that people bought to impress others became extensions of those people. Veblen referred to this as conspicuous consumption as it was buying goods and services to reflect ones wealth and status to others, the usefulness of the product or service and most of all, the message it sent out to others. These people would fall into the seduced category. As mentioned previously, all societies have divisions of some kind, which means that some can and some cannot participate within a group or consume effectively. Within consumer society, Bauman refers to those who cannot as the repressed. These are the members of society who are excluded from the included (seduced), society. â€Å"There is another group†¦who are excluded†¦. These people he calls the repressed†. (Bromley, 2009, p. 28). The repressed would include, but not limited to, the unemployed, migrants, elderly people on state pensions and people with disabilities. The absence of secure employment and a steady income made it, not impossible, but in the eyes of others (effective consumers), not seen to consume effectively, because they are unable to afford products and services at the higher end of the market, or achieve success which could amount to recognisable wealth and status . The repressed are made to feel excluded for trivial reasons like not having a computer or mobile phone, as in contemporary society most people do, or not keeping up with the latest fashions, music, lingo etc. Further, people with disabilities may feel excluded purely because money is limited, as most of it might be used for items imperative to their care e. g. prescriptions, food etc. Unfortunately, because some disabled people are unable to contribute to society in a positive way they are looked upon as societies failures. â€Å"They are more likely to be excluded from†¦and seen as somehow failed members of society†. (Bromley, 2009, p. 29). This would also relate to people who live on or below the poverty line, as it would be fair to say that all of their money, which is often very limited, is only enough to barely meet the demands of everyday living expenses. It is therefore concluded that consumer society is a divided society. There are many reasons for these divisions, wealth and status being the main, but not the only factors. In order to be included into a consumer society it is a requirement that you are able to consume effectively, in the eyes of those who do. People create their own lifestyles and personal identities which allow them to express who or what they want to be. People who are unable to consume effectively are excluded from those that do. The seduced are looked upon as the achievers in a consumer society, whilst the repressed are the non-achievers.